Construction ops, wired into one chat.
Pre-Series-A construction fit-out · ongoing
01 · The problem
Construction projects do not lose time on the worksite — they lose it in the gaps between drawing, meeting, and status update. The workflow is mostly offline, so drawings, site updates, and meeting notes never connected.
02 · What we built
CAD and PDF drawings, queryable
Drawing intelligence
Drawings parsed end-to-end. The system asks clarifying questions where a drawing is ambiguous, then feeds answers to planners and supervisors. Drawings become something the team interrogates, not inert documents.
One video replaces the unfilled form
Daily site video → status
Each supervisor records a single daily site video. Per-area status extracts automatically; the daily progress report writes itself, asking the supervisor only where it cannot tell.
Self-updating project tracker
Meeting summary → tracker
Every check-in recorded in context. Action items extracted and routed; the project tracker updates from the conversation itself — no minutes to type.
One interface over all of it
One chat assistant
Supervisors and ops query everything in natural language — site progress, drawings, schedules, action items — through one assistant sitting on top of the drawing, video, and meeting layers.
03 · Outcomes
What the team could carry forward
The hardest place to deploy AI is where the workflow is mostly offline. Start with the artifacts the team already produces — a drawing, a video, a meeting — and route them through the channel they already use. The interface decides whether the system gets used at all.